A.J. Jacobs — How to Be Less Furious and More Curious | The Tim Ferriss Show | Transcription
Transcription for the video titled "A.J. Jacobs — How to Be Less Furious and More Curious | The Tim Ferriss Show".
Note: This transcription is split and grouped by topics and subtopics. You can navigate through the Table of Contents on the left. It's interactive. All paragraphs are timed to the original video. Click on the time (e.g., 01:53) to jump to the specific portion of the video.
Hello boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss Show. My guest today, one of my favorites, one of your favorites, AJ Jacobs. AJ Jacobs is a best-selling author, journalist, and human guinea pig. Now, all of you long-term listeners from now, I do not apply that term, that label lightly, but in this case, it applies. He has written four neurotized best-sellers, including one of my favorites, the Year of Living Biblically, for which he followed all of the rules of the Bible as literally as possible, including, I should mention, Stoning Adulteras. You'll have to read it to get that. And thanks a thousand for which he went around the world and thanked every person who had even the smallest role in making his morning cup of coffee possible. I thought about this morning as I had my coffee. He has given four TED Talks with the combined 10 million plus views. He contributes to NPR in the New York Times and wrote the article My Outsource Life, which was featured in the Four Hour Workweek. What a title Four Hour Workweek who wrote that. Sounds like an infomercial. He was once the answer to one down in the New York Times, crossword puzzle, you can find my 2016. Good Lord, that's a long time ago. Interview with AJ, where we cover a lot of backstory, a lot of our shared converging paths in life at Tim.blog/aj. You can find them online, AJJcubes.com. The website for the new book is theposlerbook.com. And we'll link to all the social as well, but it tends to be AJ Jacobs on Twitter, Facebook, etc. And AJ, it is so lovely to see you again. I am so delighted to be back. And first, I have to say thank you because, for many things, but one is that beloved entertainer Hugh Jackman read my book on gratitude because of you. You know, he's a huge listener. And he put it on Instagram, and that was the first time in my life that my kids showed a modicum of respect to me because Wolverine said that my book was okay. So I'm indebted. Thank you. Well, you're most welcome. Hugh is a sweet guy, and that was thanks to 1000, which book was it? You have many of those. Yeah, he was thanks. And he's also into coffee. He has a coffee company, so it all worked together. The colliding worlds collide yet again. As the world gets smaller and smaller, it seems every day. AJ, you are prolific. I wanted to start with a bit of a flashback, and then we'll come to present.
Insights On Puzzles And Their Importance To Aj
When to use a spreadsheet fail (02:49)
So I have read, this is on 80,000hours.org, and we may have covered quite a bit of this in our first conversation because we did discuss creative process and writing process, which I'm sure we'll touch on here again, that at least with some of your books, you've had a spreadsheet, and you send the manuscript out to say 20 friends, we're nice enough to read it, and you'll ask each of them to tell you there are five favorite parts, five least favorite parts, and then you sort of look for patterns to make decisions on what to cut or keep. And I'm curious to know what you can answer this in either order, but what got cut from the puzzler that you really hoped would make it, and then what ended up being a fan favorite, a proofreader favorite? Well, I love that. I might well have gotten that strategy from you. I can't remember. I do something very similar. Yeah, so I do something very similar. So thank you. I'm giving you full credit now. But well, the weird thing is that strategy usually does work with this book. It was a complete failure because everyone has their own favorite type of puzzle, and I cover 20 different types of puzzles. So there are people who love crosswords, Sudoku's, Jigsaw's, Logic, Secret Codes, and everyone was like, this is the best chapter, and this one sucks, and they were all over the map. There was no way to see the signal in the noise, and it was a huge flop. So, do me help at all. Spreadsheet fail. Spreadsheet fail. All right, so now just for people who don't have any context, the puzzler subtitle, you are, and I also don't, I mean, bestow sounds a little grandiose. Use this, I wouldn't say this lightly, and that is you are a master of subtitles.
Choosing what to work on next (04:31)
Oh, well, thank you. They're long. Subtitles are important. Well, yes, they are long. Maybe I think that's part of the affinity. I like long subtitles too. One man's quest to solve the most baffling puzzles ever from crosswords. The crosswords, I got a little help from crosswords to Jigsaw's to the meaning of life. So there's a lot to unpack there. What made the shortlist of next books, possible next books for you, and how did you settle on the puzzler? Well, it's interesting, I actually worked on another book for three months and abandoned it right in the middle because I was miserable. And one of the big themes of the puzzler is you got to be flexible, you got to pivot, you got to always be open to new ideas. And this was an example of it. I still think it's an interesting idea. The idea was about, it was called tentatively fact-checking my life. And it was about the post-truth crisis. So what do we know and how do we know it? How do I know that the world is round? How do I know that my wife loves me? She says she loves me. I don't know. How do I know anything? And I was working on it and I was just miserable because I felt I didn't, I didn't know anything and it was freaking me out. So I make them back to it. But my agent said, you know, you love puzzles. He knows that that's my obsession and he said, why don't you just do a book about your true passion? And I thought it was fascinating because in a sense, I have loved puzzles since I was a kid and all of my books are about metaphorical puzzles. Like the year of living biblically was about the puzzle of religion. The gratitude book was how do you be more grateful in this world where it's sometimes very difficult to be grateful. And this one I was like, all right, I'm going to stop beating around the bush. I'm going to focus on literal puzzles. And why do I love them? Why do millions love them? What can they teach us and how can they make us better thinkers? And so I went all in for two years, just a deep dive. And I got to do meet crazy people and do puzzles as my job.
Admitting yourself to a mental hospital (06:50)
So I was super grateful. You've been described as the George Plimpton of thought experiments, which I think is pretty apt. And for people who don't know George Plimpton, worth checking him out, but he would, I think he did a few rounds with Sonny Liston, which if you don't know that name, you can look it up. But suffice to say, punches a lot harder than George Plimpton professional boxer and then would write about the experience or become a professional football player for a period of time than write about the experience. I wouldn't say that what you do is purely mental, but it sounds almost like what you attempted with the fact checking book was similar to someone else you have quite a bit of respect from blanking on her name, but a female writer who did quite a lot of, let's call it immersive journalism, one experiment of which was admitting herself to a mental hospital to show the abuses therein. Oh, right. This was the from the 1800s, like not occurring. The 1800s. No, this is not current. Right. And I was just thinking, I was thinking as I did a little bit of research and she popped up, you having mentioned her once before that getting admitted is the easy part. How do you especially as a woman in the 1800s get yourself out of a situation like that? But then if you're the one sort of imposing insanity or in the form of not knowing what is true or what is not, what is real or what is not when you're fact checking your life, I can see how that would be very anxiety producing as a first attempt. Yeah. I have two comments. First of all, thank you for saying I'm the George Plint and it was written somewhere.
Lesser successful Tim Ferriss comment by AJ about himself. (08:26)
I prefer to my think of myself as the less successful Tim Ferris. Because you are the master of life experiments and I'm just trying to keep up with you. I just go for the cheap applause with fat loss and writing about sex and NFTs and so on. So you're taking more honorable paths. I don't know, less successful but honorable. And yes, that woman you had mentioned was Nelly Bly and she was a great character. I don't know, there should be a movie about her. When the book Around the World in 80 Days, she actually did it. She's like, all right, I'm going to do it. So she was sort of the original guinea pig. And she also did a very Tim Ferris experiment, I think, where she decided to write an article about, and this might be a little apocryphal, but I think it's true, about why there are not more women in journalism. And she interviewed, she got an interview with all of the editors in chief of all the major newspapers in New York. And that's how she made the connection and they're like, oh yeah, maybe we should hire. So that's how she got her job. And I just think it's like, you know, that to me is sort of how you came out of being a first time writer and four hour work week, like mega blockbuster, you like met people. You know, you approached me. I didn't do much for you, but other people did. Well, I would refute that you didn't do much for me. Hey, you're very generous with your time. And I think were you working on the year of living biblically at the time you might have been. So I caught you in a period where I think you were trying very hard to be compassionate. You're already a nice guy. But I may have caught you in a really good window. Yes, you were very helpful and you gave me a lot of great advice when I was writing. I remember the coffee shop in Buenos Aires where I was and whenever it was 2005, 2006, when we were chatting, it must have been via Skype or something at the time. So I owe you thanks for that. My pleasure.
The opposite of puzzles as frivolous and why puzzles matter to AJ. (10:27)
So puzzles. I have I don't want to say abandoned, but I was I was when young, a fan of all sorts of puzzles. And I think as I got older, somehow convinced myself that I shouldn't spend time on certain frivolous activities after college anyway, and have let certain muscles atrophy. Perhaps you could just give us a little context and you can tackle it any way you want as to why puzzles are important or meaningful or valuable and you could do that via telling a story, giving us some historical context. Any way you'd like to tackle that. I think that puzzles are the opposite of frivolous. And I hope that I can entice you to come back. First of all, you do even though you say you don't do puzzles. You do puzzles because you're one of the most curious guys I've ever met and innovative thinkers. And that is the essence of puzzles. It's a problem where you use curiosity and innovative thinking to solve it. So you do you do puzzles, even if you don't think so. And these little puzzles like crosswords and logic of secret codes, they're just ways to help you come up with strategies to solve the big problems in life. So little puzzles help you with the big puzzles. I've always loved puzzles and I never I never lost my obsession about five years ago. As you mentioned in your intro, I was the answer to a clue in the New York Times crossword puzzle one down author AJ Blank. And as a word nerd, I was like, this is the greatest moment in my life. This is better than my kids being born, my marriage. And then my brother in law pointed out correctly, if a little ungenerously, that I appeared in the Saturday New York Times crossword puzzle. And if you know anything about crosswords in the New York Times, Saturday is where is the hardest, harder than Sunday. All the answers are totally obscure. No one knows them. So his point was, this is not a compliment. Like you are just this is proof you're totally obscure. No one knows. So I told that story on a podcast and it happened that a New York Times crossword constructor was listening and saved me and put me in a Tuesday puzzle, which I don't belong in. That's where like you might belong where Lady Gaga, but not me. So I didn't belong, but I loved it. And that reignited, I had done a little less obsession. And I was like, oh man, so I started doing the crossword every day, hoping to reappear after that Saturday. But I'm not monogamous. I'm promiscuous. I love all kinds of puzzles, except I did not love jigsaw's, which we can get into until this project. And now I have tremendous respect for jigsaw's, which is all about flexible thinking as we mentioned, being okay with being wrong. How does one compete in the world jigsaw puzzle championships? So this I believe was in Spain. What does such a competition look like? Because I can imagine that many people cannot imagine, including myself, what that looks like. Yeah. It's true for a lot of competitions, right? There are memory competitions and there are different events. It's kind of like a decathlon of, of attentional focus and so on. What does a jigsaw puzzle championship look like? I was totally surprised because I always think of it as a relaxing meditative. So it's like a meditation competition or a napping competition. But I found out about it because I was Googling. First of all, one of the first facts about jigsaw is that Hugh Jackman is a huge fan. Huge. He spent about 10 minutes of maybe 15 on our podcast. He and I together talking about jigsaw puzzles. So yes, huge jigsaw puzzle fan. But one of the other results, this was right before the pandemic, was that there was a world championship in Spain and it listed all of the countries that were competing and there were tons of them. There were 40 countries, Mexico, Japan, Uganda, but no USA. So on a whim, I fill out the form and figure that'll be the first of this long process to qualify. I get back an email the next day. You are team USA. And I'm like, oh, wow, that's not good. The next day, no due diligence at all. It was a disaster. Yeah. And I, as I said, I didn't love jigsaw. I thought they were, I was a snob. I thought they were too easy. They were not sophisticated.
Behind-the-scenes of the World Jigsaw Puzzle Championships. (15:02)
So I was like, oh God. So I recruited my family to be as a four person team and we flew to Spain and you have eight hours to finish four giant jigsaw puzzles and we were a designer. I mean, I'm sorry. I apologize to my fellow Americans because we came in second to last. We beat one of the Spanish hometown teams. So that's something. But these, despite the humiliation, I loved it because it was just so fascinating for so many reasons. First, just being able to see people at the top of the little Brown Jameses of jigsaw. So even if jigsaw, as you think, is a silly past, I'm seeing anyone and you know this, you've interviewed that sort of the premise. You interview the top people of every category and you're going to learn something from them. And these people, their hands move so fast. We finished one puzzle of the four in six and a half hours. The Russian team, these women, four women from Siberia finished in just over four hours. The whole thing. Their hands were moving so fast and there were rumors of doping, but I'm not too happy for them. And another part I loved was just meeting people from all over the world united by this weird obsession. And I talk about jigsaw diplomacy. I actually, I felt I was a little ahead of the curve because I have a paragraph in the book about how much I hate Putin. This was long before the Ukraine. Before it was cool. Yeah. Before it was cool. And I say, but I can't hate these people because I'm here in face to face and they're humans. And you know, I am hoping that they're one of the, some of the millions who oppose what Putin is doing now. But, but it was sort of what I called jigsaw diplomacy. So it was a wonderful experience and also learning like in everything, there are strategies you think always just putting together, but and the strategies are sometimes surprising. You don't always, everyone's like, Oh, do the do the edges first. No, not necessarily some puzzles. If they have very colorful, you do the colors first. Sometimes you focus on shapes. If you're hit with the sky, like a huge expanse of blue, you've got to sort them by shapes. So this one has two outies and one any this one. So it was just wonderful to see the nuances of this delightful and ridiculous competition. And yeah, it was one of my favorite experiences.
Division of labor for teams. (17:35)
I have a number of questions about this. The first is, how do you delegate or divide and conquer as a team? Because I can imagine if four people were just let loose having no strategy trying to put together jigsaw puzzle might take longer than just one person trying to do it. If you don't have some type of plan going into it. And second, I'm just curious, did you notice any sponsors? I'm just wondering what kind of financial support is offered to the world jigsaw puzzle championships. I'm guessing it's not a BMW. Maybe not. Yeah. But I mean, this was right before the COVID when jigsaw has experienced a boom during COVID. That's true. Not seen since the Great Depression. So they became harder to get than Clorox wipes. So so maybe now. And they could be sponsored by the envelope. But then yes, it was the only sponsor was the puzzle company itself, Raven's Burger, sadly. So I didn't make a huge amount of money on it. But the second to last finish. Yeah, let's let something. Oh, it's it's you finished. You finished. No, it's a thing. I need someone. So for strategies like, yeah, what do you do as a team? Well, you're absolutely right. That was the secret that the Russians had. They told me it's all about division of labor, like in many endeavors. So there was one woman who specialized in sorting colors and another sorted shapes, another sorted what was good at the edges. And another was really good at the trial and error, because I often am, you know, I'm afraid to put something down if I don't think she was like, no, just do it. Just be OK with failing. You know, she put things she'd try it. No, next one. No, next one. Yes. So yeah, it was fascinating to see the division. And I found that as a theme throughout puzzle solving. I went to this one event that was sort of the Ironman triathlon for nerds, which was called a puzzle hunt. And it was at MIT 2000 people like rock real rocket scientists. And they come together for 72 hours and solve the hardest, craziest, most baffling nonsensical puzzles that involve like advanced calculus and Justin Bieber's tour schedule and just the most random things you can think of. And you need 50 people on a team. The teams are 50 people because you needed specialist in all these areas. So yes, sort of a diversification and having different people do different things is a big theme, I think, in puzzles and life. Now, I mentioned I do have a number of friends or have known people through my life who have been, I don't think obsessed is an overstatement, obsessed with puzzles of different types.
What Lily has observed over the process of working on this book. (20:17)
And I was, I wanted to get the attribution. Right. One of them was one of the most curious and intelligent people I've ever met, John Horton Conway. And I'm looking at his Wikipedia. Unfortunately, he passed away some time ago, but English mathematician active in the theory of finite groups, not theory, number theory, combinatorial game theory and coding theory. He was in Cambridge and then moved to the US and helped the John von Neumann, guessing that's how that's pronounced, a professorship at Princeton University. And he could recite pie to several thousand digits and he would do it musically. I think he and his partner did that together as they would go for walks. And he was so what struck me about him. I'm not saying that the puzzles are entirely causal here, right? There's a lot going into this, but he was very childlike in two respects, A is enthusiasm for any type of puzzle. They could be mathematical, could be societal, it could be a physical game. He had physical games all over his office. And he was also very, very good at explaining complex concepts simply. And I remember for a period of time, he did public lectures on mathematics and they were standing remotely and people would come from all over the place, from all different walks of life. So that is to say my connotation with puzzles also is very positive, even though I have let my muscles maybe atrophy when working with what we would consider formal games, like jigsaw puzzles and so on. You know, the connotation is really positive. And I'm wondering what you have observed over the process of working on this book, writing this book, engaging with all the puzzles about your own thought processes or how the working on the small puzzles has helped with other types of puzzles. Well, first of all, he sounds great. I'm sorry he's not around. I would have interviewed him. Yeah. And I agree, what you characterizes the enthusiasm and curiosity. Love that to me, to the big themes of this book in terms of thought processes are our curiosity and flexible thinking. And I love curious, you know, you're one of the most curious people. I think it's one of the greatest drives that humans have, along with gratitude, gratitude and curiosity to me are two amazing forces. And actually I interviewed Alex Trebek, the late, great Alex Trebek from jeopardy once. And he said a quote that I still think about all the time, even though it doesn't quite make sense, it still totally makes sense to me. And that quote is, I'm curious about everything, even those things that don't interest me. So he's curious about everything, even those, even the most boring things. And I love that because I think it's true, whatever the topic is, you are going to, if you dig a little, you're going to find fascinating. And in fact, I once thought of a dude trying like a challenge where I write a book about the most stereotypically boring thing in the world, maybe it's counting and trying to make it interesting because it, I'm sure it is. It's not about numbers, it's about people. It's about actions and business and love and hate. So anyway, curiosity, I think puzzles just fuel my curiosity. And as I said, I see the world as a puzzle. I have what I like to call the puzzle mindset, which is, I think, so important when you are looking at world problems to adopt the puzzle mindset, which is opposed to sort of the motivated reasoning or, or anger mindset. There's a child psychologist I saw who said, don't get furious, get curious as parenting advice. But I think that's great life advice. Because that really is, if you're going to solve a problem, curiosity is the way to do it, not anger. Anger gives you tunnel vision. Like if I'm talking to someone from the opposite side of the political spectrum, instead of seeing it as a debate, a war of words, I try to see it as a puzzle that we can try to solve together. What, what do we really believe? What is our real differences and how can we overcome them? Is there any evidence I can present to him or her to make her change her mind? What is, how do we solve this puzzle?
Lilys thoughts on writing her book like a spy thriller when possible. (24:56)
So anyway, that to me is sort of the big thesis thrust of the book. Don't get curious. Well, get a little furious. Sometimes you need to, but balance it with curiosity. I would imagine you still outline your books quite a bit. You sort of think about the structure in advance. Were there any particular twists or turns or surprises or things that you found surprising in the process of putting this book together? Structure to me is everything. And I have to structure like my book on health, which was sort of the, the much less selling for our body version. And I structured it by body parts. So, you know, apart on the stomach health, what you eat and lung health, how you work out, but even hand health and butt health, like, you know, how you go to the bathroom. And I will say I missed a huge opportunity, which I realized during this. I didn't have an appendix. I should have had an appendix about a pen. It was, I think, but anyway, yeah, so many surprises. And, and I think that for me, writing is a combination of knowing where I'm going. I do structure it and outline it very thoroughly, but also allowing for some surprises and twists and turns. Like, for instance, I have a chapter on this crazy unsolved puzzle, which is located at the headquarters of the CIA. And I got permission after months to visit the CIA and see this puzzle in person.
Michaels quest for the final answer (26:25)
And I decided afterwards, like, how should I write this? And I decided I'm going to write it like, like a thriller, like a spy thriller. So that chapter almost, I tried to make it read like a spy thriller. And that was not planned. But it is a fascinating and we can talk about it. It's called cryptos, one of the craziest puzzles. No. Why is there a puzzle at the CIA? So yes, let's talk about it. What is this and why is it housed at the CIA? It's one of my favorite chapters because, yeah, it was commissioned 32 years ago by the CIA. They wanted to spruce up their grounds. And this guy, a sculptor, teamed with an ex-CIA cryptographer. And they made the sculpture, which is basically a huge metal wall with thousands of letters on it. And the letters are a secret code. And they thought it would be solved in like a week. It's been 32 years. And no one, including the CIA, which is right there, has been able to solve it fully. They have solved parts of it. And part of it seems to indicate that there's something buried on the grounds of the CIA. And we don't know what it is. It could be treasure. It could be the poison cigar. We gave Castro. Who knows? But what I love about it is many things. But one thing I love about it is that there's a group of thousands of people.
Visualizing the CIA's unsolvable Kryptos sculpture (27:50)
I'm on the online group that spend their days, hours a day, trying to crack this code. And 32 years they've been working at it. So that, to me, is like the true puzzle mindset of grit. Like they are. When I help my kids with math homework and I give up after like three minutes, I just, I now have to say these, these kind of folks have been working for 32 years on this problem. I'm going to give it another couple of minutes. So yeah, crypto is a fantastic puzzle. And I will say, just want to addendum. The sculptor is not just a genius coder and sculptor. He's also a great businessman. And I think you'll appreciate this. He got sick and tired because he would get dozens of emails every day saying, "Is the answer this? Is the answer that?" So he decided, "I will answer you yes or no, but you have to pay me $50. You have to pay penalty." Genius. He makes, who knows how much? Hundreds of dollars a day just starting. No, that's not right. That is genius. I'm wondering if this sculptor is also just the most epic troll of all time in the sense that he just created a nonsensical... That is such a great point. And I will tell you... Piece of work that cannot be broken because there is no message in which case, he's just created this amazing annuity stream for himself that's lasted 32 years. Can you imagine? It is possible that those people are. And I will say there is historical precedent for that. There's the most famous puzzler of the 1900s was this guy. He was like the Will Shorts of his day. You know, the New York Times Will Shorts. And he sold millions of this puzzle called the 15 puzzle, which you've probably seen as a kid. It's that little tiles. He moved the tiles around the numbered one through 15 and you have to make them in a square. And he had a contest where he would give, I believe it was, $10,000 at the time, which was huge that if someone solved this particular arrangement, they would win the money. But what he didn't tell him is that half of the initial arrangements are impossible to solve, just mathematically impossible to solve. And he put it in one of those. So he was like a supertroller from that era. And I will say just I have a contest. There's a secret hidden code in the book. And if you put it into the website, you can do these puzzles and try to win $10,000. They have... I am not a troll. They have an actual answer. So there is a real contest. And I think actually, since you are first out of the gate, I think you might be the first time I've mentioned it.
Nailing the perfect puzzle, complete with natural dopamine release (30:34)
Fantastic. Well, there you have it, folks. And this brings up sort of a more meta commentary on the book, which is not just about puzzles. It includes quite a lot of puzzles. So you mentioned the sculptor, you mentioned this puzzler and the 15. What makes a puzzler? If you were doing, let's just say like a CIA profile looking for patterns across the puzzlers. And what makes a good puzzler? Because you were helped in this book by master puzzle maker, Greg Pliska. Am I saying that name correctly? Yes. Yes. There are hundreds of historical puzzles, but also a bunch of new puzzles by Greg is amazing. And I would say I actually tried to make some puzzles. My wife has a company, Watson Adventures that puts on scavenger hunts. And she hired me by not paying me to make a bunch of puzzles. And I think they're okay, the puzzles, but I don't have it in me because you do need a certain level of sadism. You need to be okay with putting people through the pain because that's what people want. They want to experience pain and then the release from pain. They want that dopamine hit. And I don't know if you've had them on the podcast, Paul Bloom, great writer. He wrote a book about why do we as humans, why do we? Want to do these painful, why do we run marathons? Why do we do puzzles? Why SNM? And it is a lot about this idea of our program to struggle, struggle, struggle, and then get that payoff. You have to struggle to get that dopamine hit. But you have to be a little sadistic to be a great puzzler. And I didn't have it in me. So I stick with the masochism of doing puzzles. What other attributes do you spot? Whether those are innate nature, God-given attributes, or developed skills in people who are good at creating puzzles? Or is it just sheer volume of exposure? These have to be people who have digested and seen a million varieties of puzzles. How would you describe just as a category or a Greg specifically? What are the ingredients that make a good puzzler? Well, I do believe anyone can be a good puzzler if you can tolerate the sadism puzzle maker. But I would say, yeah, the idea for curiosity and innovative thing. Puzzles, the best puzzles, are the ones that just make you go, "Oh my God, why didn't I see that?" And it's something in your mind you feel you should have known. And you're like, "Oh, that is so clever." As opposed to crappy puzzles where you're like, "Oh, that wasn't fair." Or they're just boring, like an escape room where you have 100 keys and you have to try every key in the lot. That's just busy work. That's just like doing the dishes. The key is the leap of ingenuity. The cliche is outside the box, think outside the box, which actually comes from a puzzle. That's where it originates. The puzzle has nine dots, three on each row, and you have to draw. Yeah, this is a good one. Yeah, you have to draw four lines. Four lines, that's right. Connect the long. Connect the long. And the only way to do it is to go, you've drawn the line so far outside the box that the diagonals line up. Wow, I didn't realize that's the origin of that expression. That's cool. I did not know that. Yeah, I think outside the box.
Innovative Thinking And Problem Solving
German mathematician Gausseur invented this for himself at 10 (34:08)
And I do believe that's what the great mRNA vaccine was thinking outside the box. Like, make just part of the virus so that it kicks in the immune system. Don't make the whole virus. I mean, that was a leap. That was a brilliant way to approach it. So what are some techniques, mental strategies, anything that we can borrow from solving puzzles, making puzzles either, and apply in other areas? I got some. I got some for you. I thought you might. I have four or five that I thought we could go through at that, to me, illuminate some of the best strategies. So let me start with a little puzzle. And we'll work through it together. I'm not going to because I am very bad at doing puzzles on the spot and the stress. So I don't want to put you, you know, I know you're brilliant. So we all know that. This is cultivate your inner status. Maybe it'll make you a better puzzle maker. So this is a puzzle that's based on a famous story of a German mathematician named Goutes in the 1700s. And he was nine years old in school. And the teacher said, the assignment is add up all of the whole numbers from one to a hundred and tell me the answer. And two seconds later, Goutes raises his hand. And the teacher is like, what the hell? You couldn't have done it. And Goutes says, no, I did it. So so the puzzle is, how did he do it? How did he add up one through a hundred? Boy, I'm going to just. Tuffy. Go straight. Yeah, let's skip to straight. No, chase. Or. I'll leave you to get to the spoil. I mean, the default way, which is what I thought. And most people think you add one plus two is three, you know, one plus two plus three, three plus three is six. And you just go straight through. But Goutes realized, no, that there's a better method. Because one plus a hundred is one hundred one. Two plus ninety nine is a hundred one. Three plus ninety eight is a hundred one. So you take these pairs and they're 50 pairs. So 50 times a hundred one. That's not that hard. Five thousand fifty. That's the answer. So to me, this is a very Tim Ferriss way to think. Because what he what he did was he didn't immediately dive into solving the problem and doing the busy work. He took a step back and he said, what is the meta strategy? What am I actually? What's my goal? What is a better way to solve this problem? And you know, many of your books like have a lot of this, the four hour work week. What is the real goal? Is the goal to have as many clients as possible? Or is it to have a good life and make enough money? So fire those pain in the ass clients. To me, that is a very Gaussian way to approach it. Wow. How old and nine years old? Who knows who it is. Yeah, for sure. But it makes for a good story. Is this the, am I making this up? Is this the Gauss of Gaussian distribution? I wonder. I'm thinking. Yeah, the Gaussian distribution, which is a normal distribution.
Abraham Lincoln and the axe (37:20)
I won't take us too far down that rabbit hole. All right. So Gauss, nine year old one, Tim Ferriss zero, but I appreciate the approach. It is very Abraham Lincoln too. And of course, probably apocryphal. Maybe it's attributed to Groucho Marx or Gondia online, because those tend to be three of the top sort of blanket attributions. But if I have four hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend the first three hours sharpening the axe. So thinking about the meta strategy and the right tool for the job. Yeah, that's a good. All right. Can I give you another? It's being 10 to. Goddamn it, AJ. You're always interrupting me on this podcast. And I'm supposed to be asking you questions. Please continue. Yes. Number two. All right. Another strategy that I love is we talked about it before. Just the flexibility. Just the flexibility of mind is so crucial. Getting caught in a mental rut is the enemy of coming up with good solutions. And I'll give you a puzzle example and then a real life example. So the puzzle example is I have a section on British crosswords, which are insane, crazy, much harder than Americans. They have all these weird obscure word plays and you don't know what's going on. So for instance, one of the clues in the British crossword was the letters, four letters, G E G S, G E G S. And I'm like, all right. What is a gag? So I focus. What is a gag? And I look it up and even use Google, which I try not to do. And it's the Portland symbol for the Portland airport is a gag. And there are a couple other like urban dictionary gags that maybe are not appropriate. So anyway, I'm like, focus. What is a gag? And I finally just give up after half an hour and take a break. I don't give up. I take a break, which is also a huge puzzle and problem solving strategy. Take a break because it resets your mind. Leonardo da Vinci talked about taking breaks. So I took a break and I came back and I was like, maybe it's not a gag. Maybe there's something in the letters.
Scrambled eggs (an example of flexible thinking). (39:30)
And eventually I noticed that gags, if you rearrange them, is eggs, E G G S. So the answer is scrambled eggs. Gags is scrambled eggs. So which was annoying, but also brilliant. Yeah. But that to me is the key. Don't lock in on your thesis. Have it provisional. Always be open to new ways of looking at it. Jake's sauce is an example. I hated Jake's sauce and I found that they are incredibly subtle and interesting. Or I was obsessed with ending this puzzle book in a certain way. And I was talking to my son and he's like, I don't know. That doesn't sound great. So I totally abandoned that. So yeah, flexible thinking, loosely held belief. I am a big fan of some beliefs you should hold deeply. Like, don't be an asshole. That belief to me is like, that's sacrosanct. But many other beliefs I have are just provisional probabilistic.
Why are jigsaw puzzles called jigsaw puzzles? (40:31)
Why are jigsaw puzzles called jigsaw puzzles? Is the jigsaw a tool they used to cut the pieces? What is that? Well, originally, yes. Yes, it was. They made them out of wood and they used a jigsaw, which is a saw. I think it's sort of in the shape of a question mark with a saw and you carve it. And there still are hand carved wood and puzzles. There's one of the chapters I go to, this crazy company in Vermont that makes hand carved wood and puzzles that are insanely expensive. Like, they go up to $10,000. Oh, they must. Bill Gates is a fan. The guy who owns it calls himself the chief tormentor because they're not regular puzzles. He is suggesting. He loves to say that was a... So yeah, because they're totally different than normal puzzles. They have holes in them. They have pieces that don't fit. Oh, wow. They have pieces that go three-dimensional. So yeah, I'm a big fan. That's called Steve puzzles. So if you have enough money, check it out. Chief torture. Chief tormentor. Chief tormentor. Oh, tour-ementer. Pretty close. Pretty close. Tour-ementer. I mean, tour-mentor is like what the older sibling does to a younger sibling. It's a little less intense than torture, but nonetheless. All right. So... Another? Yeah, another, please. All right. Well, this one I love. The idea is to reverse your thinking, to think upside down, to think totally differently. So I'll give you a riddle, a classic riddle. There's a man in a room. The walls are cement and the floor is dirt. And the only opening is this locked door in the room and a skylight. The man has a shovel and he starts to dig. He knows it's impossible to turn a lout, but he continues to dig anyway. So what's going on? Why does he keep digging? Even though he knows he can't turn a lout. So this one I'm going to admit, I know the answer to. So I don't want to do too much, you know, thinking of the academy for my acting as I pretend like I don't know the answer. But why don't you explain it? And then I'll have a little bit of commentary because I love these types of riddles. And when I was younger, I actually did. And by younger, I mean, even up through high school and maybe even early college, love these types of riddles that force you to check a lot of your assumptions about whatever you just heard. So why don't you unpack that, please? Well, I'm very impressed with your honesty. It's actually just a quick side note. I have a chapter on escape rooms and the escape room owners tell me that there's always a guy who comes every week with a date, a new woman and pretends that it's his first time that the escape room. And she's supposed to be like, wow, you can solve the NATO alphabet. I want to go to bed with you. I guess that's the theory. But anyway, so it's quite a racket that guys running. No, it's dozens of guys across the country. They all say they have one. So the way to do this is to reverse your thinking. So instead of focusing on the fact that he's digging a hole, what else is he doing? He's doing the opposite. He's building a mountain, a little mountain of dirt. And he's going to climb that mountain and get to the skylight. And I love this because I use it in everyday life. I use it, you know, collecting the laundry.
Reversing your thinking to solve problems. (44:03)
I reverse my thinking. And this one came up yesterday. Well, wait, wait, hold on, hold on. You're selecting the laundry. How do you apply? Please explain. I live with three teenage boys, so there are clothes every corner. So I used to go around and collect them and arm load and put them in the hamper in our bedroom. But I realized, what if I took the hamper with me and put the clothes in so I don't have to make as many trips? So I like reversed it. I was like, bring the hamper to the clothes. So yes, I am a genius. That is the conclusion. But to give you another example that's maybe more, I don't know, important. My son said to me yesterday, if the power goes out, what's to stop the elevator from plummeting to the basement and killing us? And I looked it up and it turns out that elevator breaks work the opposite of the way you think. The default is that the elevator breaks are clamped on the elevator. And they only are released when there's an electric current, so the electromagnetism opens them up. So if the electricity goes out, if there's a blackout, the breaks automatically clamped on, which is the opposite of what I thought. You need to activate the breaks. But some genius said, no, this is a better system. So whoever it is, thank you for that for ensuring you saved my life. I love these word riddles and actually one came to mind.
The Man in the Elevator. (45:31)
I'm not going to get it totally right, but this is from like 20 years ago, 25 years ago. They could be so simple. There's a woman who's afraid. She's afraid because she can't go home because the man with the mask is there. Who is the man in the mask? And then the person who's attempting to answer it can ask yes or no questions. This is sort of a common game that we would play. And even think about it, you can go through all sorts of hoops. And ultimately in this example, it's a game of baseball. I love that. Great to go to a home base. Yeah. Sometimes I've heard it as two men in masks. So you got the other guy. All right. Yeah. That would be a better way of phrasing it, for sure. What are these types? I mean, are they just known as riddles or are these? Those are sometimes called lateral thinking. And again, the idea is lateral thinking involves totally reframing and looking at what your assumptions are, which again, I think is crucial in thinking about real life problems and a very ferrous. So I'm surprised that you even gave them up because they are very ferrous ways of thinking. They're super fun. I think I was just encountering them piecemeal and didn't know where to find a collection of them. I think that's probably what it came down to is that I would very once in a blue moon run into something. I remember another one, which was, and you probably know the better phrasing, but it was something like there's a man in a room. He's dead on the floor. And there are 53 bicycles in the room. What happened? And he was cheating at cards. Right. Yeah, the bicycle cards. I got it. I love that. Yeah. But it takes a while.
The Art Of Creating Unsolvable Puzzles
Take Out the Trash, Flip the Lights! (47:16)
Well, I can send you a website with all of them. I don't have it off. Or you can buy my book, which has Get the book, folks. It's shameless. You got to be shameless sometimes, especially on podcasts. That's right. If you were choosing for yourself kind of best bang for the buck, puzzles, and by bang for the buck, I mean, puzzles that are enjoyable/interesting enough that you'll keep doing them, but that also seem to have an impact on the rest of your life. And that can be super broad. It could help you sleep. It could help you with your thinking. It could help in any way. Are there any particular types of puzzles that kind of make the final cut if you think about them through that lens? I love that question. Well, I guess I would break it down into what is your goal. So if your goal, again, is to go to sleep, then, you know, jigsaw's are very meditative. If your goal is to learn how to think, then buying one of these lateral thinking puzzles or one of these incredibly hard British puzzles, British crosswords, also one of my favorite genres that I knew very little about is Japanese puzzle boxes. So I would recommend that for just for pure wonder and awe. And these are, I actually went to Japan where they make them and they are wooden boxes, but they're works of art. They're gorgeous. And you have, they're locked and you have to manipulate them. Sometimes it's spinning them. Sometimes it's turning them upside down. Sometimes it's moving 100 slats in a certain order to open them. And they have become this cult and they're people who pay thousands of dollars, tens of thousands of dollars for the most, you know, rarest of these puzzle boxes. Apparently Russian oligarchs buy them out or they used to. I don't know if they can afford it anymore. Hopefully not. These things are really extraordinary. And I will say I'm friends with, you might know him, John Rulin, who is, his expertise is giftology. He wrote giftology. It's all about giving gifts and how they can make your life better and make other people's lives better. So they make these boxes and all sorts of themes. So I gave my editor Japanese puzzle blocks in the shape of a book. So if you are looking for a great gift or you're looking for something to inspire, wonder and awe, that's a beautiful object. That's a good one, Japanese puzzle boxes. You know, I've actually seen some of these in person in Japan because as you may or may not know, live there as an exchange student for a year. I've gone back many times since. And they are stunningly beautiful and very intricate. I mean, you'll have, as you mentioned, some you have to turn upside down because there are ball bearings or other weight loaded components that will shift only if you tilt them in a certain direction. Absolutely stunning. It's, I was hoping to bring this up because my latest book I got is this, which makes me think of a lot about Japan. Anyway, not relevant to the conversation, but visions of Japan by Kawaseh Hasui's masterpiece. There's a lot of people who don't, Hokusai would have been becoming more and more interested in other woodblock based. Artists, I need to thank Maria Popova for that reference. Oh, yes, she's great. And by the way, have you ever had Darren Aronofsky on the program? I have a long time ago, long time ago. Because he is super into puzzle boxes and he actually designed one of the most intricate, I mean, he commissioned one of the most intricate puzzle boxes ever. It's a desk by this artist named Kagan, Kagan Sound. And the desk has 22 secret puzzles in it. And it took Kagan four years to make. He lives in Colorado and it literally, it's like one of Darren's movies. It drove him crazy. Like he had a mental breakdown. Where's my pencil? Oh no. So yeah, they are really remarkable.
Sleeping beauty and the Monty Hall Problem (51:26)
Well, let's talk about the shadow side of puzzles. So it drove him crazy. Yeah, there is a shadow side. I see a bullet here tackling a logic puzzle that literally drives people insane and has spawned 100 philosophy papers. Please tell me more about this. Oh yes, this is called the Sleeping Beauty Problem. And it's a cousin of the Monty Hall problem. Do you know the Monty Hall problem? I don't. I don't know that either. Maybe you could explain. So the Monty Hall problem is a very famous puzzle. Very controversial. And it was popularized by Marilyn Vos Savant. I don't know if you've had her on the show. This woman who says she's got the highest IQ ever. So she wrote a column in Parade Magazine. No comment on why the smartest woman was writing a Parade Magazine. Our column. Because she's smarter than me. So she would slam me. But anyway, the problem she popularized was this. Suppose you're on a game show and you're given a choice of three doors. Behind one door is a car. And behind the other two doors are goats. Assuming you want the car and not the goats. So your goal is to pick the door with the car. So you pick door number one and the host. He knows what's behind all three doors. And he says, well, I'm going to open door number three. Before I answer whether you got it right, I'm opening door number three, which and behind that door is a goat. Then he says to you, so you want to switch? You want to pick door number two instead? Oh my god. And most people's god is like, now, why? Why would it matter? It's like 50/50, right? But it's not. Oh, you should switch. You should switch. Okay. So this is a better question for my brother who has a lot of statistics and mathematical training and inclination. Okay. So I would not have passed. I would have failed that test. Most people do because it's so counterintuitive. And that's another big theme of puzzles, I think, is that don't trust your gut. I am very wary of my gut. I feel my gut as an idiot, especially when it comes to manners of probability. So yes, you should switch. And when she wrote this, she got hundreds of condescending letters from her mathematicians saying, you're an idiot, but she's right. You should switch. And you can look it up wide, but basically, instead of your initial odds of one to three, you are choosing. You have a two out of three probability of getting the car, because he didn't, Monte didn't just pick a random door. He knew what was behind all three doors and he picked a goat. So then it narrows it down. But anyway, this sleeping beauty problem, I mean, I'm not going to say it because it's super complicated and it'll put you to sleep. But it is in the book, but it has caused, as you say, 100 philosophy papers. And I love it because this is one of the puzzles that has no correct. People are still debating what the answer is. Is the answer two out of three or is it one out of two or something else?
Creating the hardest unsolvable puzzle ever (54:40)
So I love a puzzle that cannot be solved. And actually, as part of the book, I commissioned what I believe is the hardest puzzle in the history of the world. And it cannot be solved because you cannot solve it by the time the universe runs out of energy. It's a mechanical puzzle where it's got a metal rod inside a tower. And in the tower, there are all these pegs. And you have to turn the pegs to remove the metal rod. But you have to turn the pegs many times, many, many times, 1.2 decillion times, which is one with 33 digits. Yeah, so it is literally, if you do one every second, every nanosecond, the universe will end. And I love that. I love that. So what was the impetus for creating this puzzle? And this is Jacob's ladder, am I right? Yes, exactly. Okay. A few reasons I loved it. One, it's part of a genre called Generation Puzzles, where you pass them down from generation to generation, because no one person can solve it. So I love this idea of connecting generations and thinking of it, you mentioned 80,000 hours, and they talk a lot. That's the effective altruism movement. They talk a lot about the far future and our like, 14th great grandkids. And so this is a sort of a way to connect with that. One of the great Japanese puzzle makers, he was called the godfather of Sudoku, and he summarized puzzles in much of life with three symbols. The question mark, the forward arrow, the exclamation point. You arrive, you're baffled, forward arrow is the struggle, the wrestling with the, and then the exclamation point is the revelation. And he said, this is very Zen, he said, you have to embrace the arrow. You have to learn to love the solving, because you're not always going to get to the exclamation point. So this is the ultimate arrow. This arrow goes on until you, you know, to the end of the universe. So I love that, I love that. And it's also, I love it, because it's kind of like a ritual that I can do, a little meditative ritual. So yeah, I am a big, there's only one in the world, Jacob's ladder. Where's it located? I'm looking at it right now, it's the left of my desk, it's taunting me. I mean, the guy, he's a brilliant puzzle maker, Oscar van de Venter, was the one who designed it. So he's going to release the plans on the internet, so you can 3D print one yourself. So it will be available. So it sounds like Jacob's ladder. Maybe the, if you commercialize this and sell it, the company logo should be the question mark and the forward arrow without the exclamation point. I love it. All right, I'm in.
What experiments and experiences A. J. might take forward from Furry Brain Puzzles (57:43)
Well, you are a collector of experiments and experiences. And just if you look at your last handful of books, when you certainly span a lot of disciplines. And one question I'm curious to hear your answer to related to the puzzler is, what you think a year or two from now, you might still have taken with you from this book, whether it's a habit, a new type of puzzle, could be anything. And I remember you and I chatting years ago, after the year of living biblically. And one of the things that you took from that for a period of time, at least, was wearing white. And then after that, wearing more colors. And there's a lot more to that story. But what do you think you may take forth from all the work you've done on the puzzle? Just to dip into the white wearing white clothes, I love that at least at one point had an influence on you. Because you and I both are big believers in the outer effects, the inner, your behavior effects, your thoughts. And so wearing white, it just has this connotation of lightness. And like you're going to go play Wimbledon. Or I think I used in the book that you might go to P Diddy's white party, but I don't think exists anymore. But anyway, yes, that was one of the many things I took away. I also took away from that gratitude, which turned into its own book. For this one, the puzzle mindset, it really reinforced this puzzle mindset, which is all about seeing the world as puzzles. Don't get furious, get curious, flexible thinking, all that. But more specifically, I do think every morning I have some rituals where I spend 15 minutes brainstorming ideas and 99% of them suck. But I just feel that the mental gymnastic, sort of the aerobic workout of your brain is very helpful in solving real puzzles and life puzzles and coming up with new ideas. But in addition to that now, I am addicted to several puzzles. If you're going to have an addiction, I think it's a good one. So I do the spelling bee in the New York Times, Wordle, which was such a huge phenomenon. A friend of mine described it as the Ted Lasso of puzzles, because it's very nice. You're probably going to get it. So it's not too sadistic. And of course, the New York Times crossword puzzle. So I will continue to do that. And I will also, I loved all of the dozens of subcultures of people I met. So I do hope to keep in touch with them because they are such curious and bizarre and interesting thinkers and such great characters. Is there any subculture that, even if the task or the question was, okay, twice a month for the next year, you need to have dinner with someone from this subculture, like a long dinner, not a sure.
The cryptographers (01:00:42)
It could be beer. It could be something else. But just like, I'm wondering which subculture you're like, you know, I could be like an honorary or dishonorable inductee for a short period of time, depending on how things go. Where do you think you would lean? There are so many that I find fascinating. But one, I do love the codebreakers, the cryptographers. And I'm terrible at codes. And they range from professional cryptographers to, you know, janitors to writers to artists. But they are all obsessed with breaking codes. The cryptos one I mentioned, but also there's something called the zodiac killer and his letters. So those are still on there. They're like, you know, few dozen codes that still have never been solved. But they obsess over them. One of the ones I featured in my book was this amazing woman named Alonka Dunan, who she consulted on codes for the CIA and the FBI after 9/11. And she is so obsessed with cryptos that she moved to DC to be closer to cryptos. Wow. Talking to them, you realize how much secret codes, I won't say in fact, though, just affect every part of our lives, you know, cryptocurrency and your bank account. And your passwords and these secret code and military. So secret codes may be a puzzle, but they are a crucial puzzle for humanity. And in fact, one of the historical things I mentioned in the book is that there was a puzzle in 1942 in the telegraph newspaper. And it was a crossword puzzle. And it said at the bottom, if you solve this in 12 minutes or less, call this number. And that number turned out to be the British Secret Service, the spy agency. And it was a recruitment tool for the people who cracked the enigma code, the Nazi enigma code. So you could say the crossword puzzle saved the world.
Signal in the noise (01:03:01)
And for people interested, I just want to lay out the spelling. So cryptos is K-R-Y-P-T-O-S. Sculpture by the American artist Jim Sandward located on the grounds of the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley, Virginia. And there's a whole Wikipedia entry. But certainly the first-hand experience of having spent time there, as you did, I think is is working into. Do you find not to in any way imply that the woman you just mentioned falls prey to this, but that people interested in cryptography have a high risk of psychosis, but seeing signal where there is noise, right? So ending up succumbing to all sorts of conspiracy theories, or God knows what. I mean, there are a million pitfalls. Kind of in the gray zone. Totally. I mean, that is, I love that question. Because that I do have, I talk about the dark side of puzzle. I think they're mostly enforced for good, but if you don't have that flexibility of mind and you get obsessed with puzzles and you fall in love with your particular hypothesis, there's a word for it. It's not psychosis, it's apophania. Apophania is one of my favorite words I learned. And it is when you see signal in the noise. I mean, the classic is you see Jesus, Jesus's face on a piece of French toast. And yes, it is a big danger. I mean, you look at these online groups for cryptos and their people. No, it's gotta be a Morse code. It's gotta be the Illuminati. Yes, there's definitely. I mean, QAnon is basically a puzzle gone wrong. It's people who have figured out a solution that they think is right. And no amount of counter evidence will allow them to change their mind.
Exploring The Depth Of Puzzles And Their Existential Significance
The dark side of human nature1997 (01:05:03)
So yeah, you got it. And I also have a section in the book about this famous book from in 1980, 81 in England, where it was a picture book with clues to a hidden treasure, a golden rabbit hidden somewhere in England. And it caused a mania. Like people were digging up yards and trespassing looking for this gold. Finally, someone found it. But what was crazy is that even after someone found it, there were dozens, hundreds of people who were like, no, no, my theory is right. They refused to abandon their theory even after it was found. And that to me is a very dangerous look at the dark side of human nature. Wow. Apophania learning all sorts of things. So let's take a revisit of this subtitle. So one man's quest to solve the most baffling puzzles ever from cross words to jigs us to the meaning of life.
The biggest sadist in all of Vermont. (01:05:59)
So I'm going to give you, there's a fork in the road that we can take here. And we can go to meaning of life and you can expand on why that's in the subtitle or we could go to the hardest corn maze in the world. Well, that's if you have time, maybe I'll just do quickly the corn made. I have time. I feel like if you do the meaning of life, that's kind of like, where do you go from there? Right, right. Hard to segue from that to the corn maze. But yes, I have a section on mazes, which we're fascinating. And I found the hardest corn maze in the world is in Vermont. And it is so hard. Talk about sadism, the guy who created it just revels in the amount of pain and misery. He talks joyously about couples getting into massive fights, people weeping, you know, hundreds of people just breaking out into years of frustration, a father who abandoned his family and drove off because he was so passionate. So it is incredibly hard. Their emergency exits because it's so hard, people get freaked out. And I did it. It took about four and a half hours and a bunch of hints. But I loved interviewing him because one of the things- Hold on. A bunch of hints. Do you have an earpiece and he's like, go right. I can see you from the drone. Go left. Well, what he does is he stands on a platform in the middle of the maze like a god and you can go up to him and plead your case. You know, I'm so frustrated. And you help me. Oh my god, that's incredible. He's great. But I asked him, you know, standing on that platform, what have you learned from observing human nature? And he said that one, the theme that we've talked about is, you know, the ones who are never going to make it out are the ones who have no flexibility of mind, who just go down the scene. They're like, this is the way I swear. And they'll hit a wall. They'll go back. They'll do it again. They'll keep him. He does say that teenage boys are particularly prone to this. So I have teenage boys. I'm trying to say, you know, flexibility. You got to be flexible. Because I guess the testosterone kicks in and it's like, I'm right. Go testosterone, yeah. So he was great. And I am a big fan of Mays as another genre that I wasn't particularly obsessed with before.
Surprising hotbeds for puzzle making in the world. (01:08:27)
But I do see the beauty of them now. Mayses. Yeah, Mayses. Vermont unexpectedly has come up quite a bit. I mean, you mentioned the sort of Bill Gates Bugatti of Jigsaw puzzles from the Chief Tormentor, which I think you mentioned were made in Vermont. You've got the most difficult corn maze in the world in Vermont. It makes me think of these unlikely epicenters or places that are famous for things you wouldn't expect, right? Like Gilroy, California is the garlic capital of the world. And you would never guess that unless you haven't been driving by it as I had many times when I lived in California. Are there hot beds of puzzle creation? I think so. I mean, Vermont, I mean, these are not as unexpected. These are not Gilroy. Japan makes amazing puzzles. Russia is known for making amazing. And one of the chapters is about chess puzzles, which are different from chess games. And I interviewed, I played with Gary Kasparov, who is a big fan of chess puzzle. Although he himself is not the greatest chess puzzler because it's a different skill than regular chess. And just very quickly, a chess puzzle is when you have a certain arrangement of pieces on the board, like a king and a rook and a queen. And you have to checkmate the other side in a certain number of moves. So it's a constrained puzzle as opposed to an unconstrained game. And these people, it's a different skill set. They're these people who are like the Gary Kasparovs of chess puzzles. And I love talking to him because you've had him on the show, right? I imagine. I haven't. I haven't. Anytime I've ever met, well, I didn't really meet him. Gary Kasparov, quick side note, is when I was presenting it, Ted, however many years ago. And it was my first time, you know, on this big stage, this big event. And I was very nervous. And I was told by the organizers, well, before you go up, when you're like three or four out, you can go into the Zen pod. They had some word for this place. It was supposed to be very calming. And I had all of this beautiful imagery and it was supposed to be this very Zen sedating place where you could prepare for what would otherwise be very, very stressful. And I remember walking out because I was sweating already to whatever this Zen pod was. And the people on deck before me were Gary Kasparov and like two other super geniuses. And they were pacing like they're on death row about to go to execution. And I was like, this is not going to help my nerves. And so I turned around and I left. This is my one and only exposure to Gary Kasparov. That is funny. Yeah, that would not be good for your nerves. And I will tell you, I mean, he was very gracious to come to my apartment and allow me to interview him. I will say he's not like the softest and cuddliest guy, which is probably good. You know, he saw this Vladimir Putin thing come to. But he, when he came, I had set up my chest set so that we wouldn't waste any time. And he looked at it and he said, that is a very cheap chest sat I see. And I was like, oh, it's like a plastic thing I had bought on Amazon.
What Gary Kasparov thinks about the cheap chess set Zach has. (01:11:43)
And I was like, oh, and he said, no, don't worry. I grew up in the Soviet Union. I'm used to cheap plastic chest sets. So he forgave me, but he was not impressed. But he was fast because one of the keys he says to chest puzzles is again, the counter intuitive and looking at the long view, the long view, which he's good at. And in life as well, that the best puzzles make you do things that are short term crazy, like sacrifice your queen. A lot of them are about sacrificing your queen. But in the long run, they will pay off. So that's I like that as a life lesson. Just look at the long view. I imagine, I mean, I know very little about chess, but that perhaps the reason these chess puzzles are not comparable to chess games is that they are presenting the pieces and configurations that would almost never occur in a natural game. And I do know some very good chess players, but they become very good at chunking the board into sections where they might recognize a particular sequence of moves that they have already recorded to memory from studying historic games or having played a thousand matches in a certain way. But when you then get to a puzzle, perhaps it's almost nonsensical, right? There isn't any historical record to kind of play off of to figure out what the next best move is. That's exactly it. I mean, that is some of the most famous puzzles are just crazy. There's a genre called grotesque, which sounds very grotesque puzzles, chess puzzles, and it'll be 16 black pieces and only two white pieces, but white can win. And you have to figure out how can white win. So it's a real like David versus Goliath thing. But yeah, they look crazy. You know, there are 16 black pieces huddled in the corner. Never would happen in a real game. All right. Meaning of life. I think we've pushed it as long as we can. All right. Well, I first of all put it in there just because I wanted to show puzzles are not trivial, like, you know, waste time frivolous that. So there's a little of that.
Ultimately, what is the meaning of puzzles and the meaning of life? (01:14:05)
So I may not have actually solved the meaning of life by the end, but I will say, and I hope it doesn't come off as Pat because I truly believe it. Part of the meaning of life is the search for the meaning of life. For sure. Curiosity, as we've said over and over is to me one of the greatest gifts. It's a key to a joyous life. It's a key to resolving conflicts. It's a key to to business, family, everything. So to me, like never giving up on the search for the meaning of life is a big part of the meaning of life. Less furious, more curious. That came originally or your source was parenting advice. Yeah, I was watching. They had a webinar deep in the middle of the pandemic where it was as titled psychologist in the ways to survive the pandemic with your kids because, you know, it was just horrible. So I was like, maybe there's something. And that was the phrase he used. And he meant it in parenting terms. So like when you're a two year old is throwing a tantrum, don't get furious. You know, get curious why is the kid throwing a tantrum? What can we do to prevent it in the future? What will work? So instead of just getting angry and giving up, look at it from with a sense of, and I think that's very good for your own mental health. Otherwise, you know, when I read the newspaper, or I don't read newspaper, when I read media online parade, when you're reading parade, my favorite column in parade. I mean, I do read the paper. Just not like folded paper. But when I'm doing that, if I don't look at it like a puzzle, I get so angry and it's just not good for my health. So yeah, look at it more like there are different ways to put it. Some people say the engineer mindset versus the lawyer mindset. I like Adam Grant as he calls it the be a scientist, the scientist worldview instead of the prosecutor or the preacher or the hand of one other P, he was very good with the illiteration. So yeah, look at the world that way. But they're all the same thing. Pescatarian maybe. Could be pescatarian. Exactly. Those pescatarians are very narrow minded. Well, AJ, what's, I mean, we've covered a fair bit, but I'm, I'd still love to hear you just reiterate for people what you hope they gain.
What does A.J. want to readers to take away from The Puzzler? (01:16:38)
Not just from the book, certainly the book. I mean, I hope people check them out. I've never been disappointed by a book of yours. I think you're an excellent, an excellent writer, but also an excellent entertainer. And the combination of those two, I think often results in you being an outstanding teacher because you take what can otherwise be very difficult to absorb or difficult to understand. And you provide a wrapper that makes it really easy to digest. And I've always admired that. And that goes back to some of your earliest work. Certainly the year of living biblically, I thought was outstanding. What do you hope people will get from, from, from this and puzzles? If there are any stones we haven't turned over yet? Yeah. Tons. I mean, just to reiterate some of what we've covered, I mean, it's got tons of puzzles in it. So I hope that they will do those and find the joy of puzzles. It's got the contest, which I hope you'll enjoy even if you don't win. It's got my adventures, but it's also got this way of hopefully looking at the world, which will make your life better, make you happier, more effective, more productive, both in the macro sense of looking at the world as a puzzle and in the more micro sense of here are 10 strategies for solving puzzles. And we went over three or four of them, but there are plenty more in the book. And yeah, I hope that people, I think it's funny because I didn't plan this. I feel very lucky, but you know, we are in a puzzle boom right now. And people are obsessed with Wirtle and jigsaw's. And so I hope that that as COVID hopefully ends, that that doesn't die. But people will continue this love of puzzles because I really do think that they make the world a better place. And maybe if I can, you know what, oh, this is good. I'm going to make you a little gift box of puzzles that are going to blow your mind and get you sucked back into the puzzle cult. Oh, I would love that. The gateway drug box of puzzles by AJ Jacobs. Yes. I would love that. I would love that. Thank you so much. And I also want to give voice to something that I've been thinking throughout this entire conversation. And that is, if you, and you pointed this out already when I said that I dropped puzzles, I haven't dropped puzzles. It's just that my narrow definition of puzzles needs to be expanded. Right. And if we think of puzzles in a sense as games, but certain roles, certain constraints, certain desired outcomes, that we're all playing games. If you think about outside of the lowest rungs of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, what we're opting into, we are playing games. And I guess the first order of business is to try to identify which games we're playing and try to make sure we're playing the right games because the social conventions around us can be enabling or disabling. And I would expect that the way you present subject matter and the way you tell stories will help people to realize that the water they swim in is already full of puzzles. And that by, as you said, sort of working on the micro puzzles, you can develop capacities that then translate to the macro puzzles. You just reminded me, you have been doing puzzles. I mean, in your first book, when you talked about the martial arts competition you won, that was a puzzle. That was like you used an innovative technique and then tango also a puzzle. So yeah, you are a puzzler whether you know it or not. This was, that's true for a lot of people listening, "HAs or anything else that you would like to mention, any requests you'd like to make, public complaints, you'd like to lodge anything at all that you would like to add before we bring this conversation to close?" I will say, I mean, I hope you buy my book or at least take it out of the library or enjoy it or talk about it. But I have not settled on my next book and I have found that readers or just listeners have sometimes wonderful ideas, sometimes not, but sometimes interesting ideas. So if you feel like getting in touch with me through my website or Twitter, I would love to hear from you about what you think I should embark on next. Wonderful people can find you at agjcubes.com, A.J. Jacobs on Twitter. What can people find at thepuzzlerbook.com? What will people find on this website?
The Puzzler Book Promotion
That is where you enter the code for the contest that will open up to about 20 wild puzzles that I did not design. These Greg Plisk and these great designers made them. So if you want to enter the contest, it is thepuzzlerbook.com and there are all these disclaimers about you have to be 18 and live in the United States, etc. So that is on there. But you can also, there are a bunch of puzzles on there as well. So even if you don't enter the contest, it might be worth checking out.
Little something for everybody. And we will link to all of the social link to all the websites in the show notes at tim.blog/podcast as per usual. And I am very happy that you made it both into the Saturday and Tuesday editions of the New York Times Cross proposal. Getting a two for that seems, you know, unless you are Justin Bieber, I think, I mean, I have to imagine that is quite an unusual honor to actually get a double header. I don't deserve it, but I am happy to take it. Who deserves anything? I mean, I think you were able to, you managed to appear twice. So one could argue. They were the results justified in this case, the means. And so nice to see you again, AJ. Thanks for taking the time. So fun. What a blast. Thank you, Tim. And for everybody listening, as always, and as I already mentioned, we'll have links to all the resources in the show notes at tim.blog/podcast. And certainly check out AJ's new book, The Puzzler Subtitle One Man's Quest to Solve the most baffling puzzles ever from crosswords to jigsaw to the meaning of life. And until next time, be a little kinder than is necessary. Take care of yourselves. And thanks for tuning in.